MTB 1000 - 1500 € oder doch Crossbike?

[schoeppi]

Die war auch nicht für dich gedacht, @S1Fahrer , sondern für den TE.
Und der wusste worauf ich hinaus wollte.

Für dich sind meine Posts sowieso nie gedacht.

 

[Florent29]

Einfach mal so zu behaupten Carbon ist "besser" wäre zu simpel gedacht.

In diesem Zusammenhang darf ich das Zentralorgan des Mountainbikens, pinkbike, zitieren:

If there were no price difference between carbon and aluminum frames, aluminum mountain bikes would be extinct, except for those built by bike makers, or for customers who adhere to religious beliefs about the cosmic virtues that steel and aluminum bestow upon otherwise ordinary fabricated structures.

Dem ist nichts hinzuzufügen.

 

[S1Fahrer]

In diesem Zusammenhang darf ich das Zentralorgan des Mountainbikens, pinkbike, zitieren:

If there were no price difference between carbon and aluminum frames, aluminum mountain bikes would be extinct, except for those built by bike makers, or for customers who adhere to religious beliefs about the cosmic virtues that steel and aluminum bestow upon otherwise ordinary fabricated structures.

Dem ist nichts hinzuzufügen.

Das ist doch nur eine persönliche Meinung eines Redakteurs.

Das Dirt Magazin schreibt:

There are two main frame materials you will encounter when deciding to buy a mountain bike – carbon and aluminium. Most of the bikes ridden at World Cup/Enduro World Series level will be carbon (although it isn’t ubiquitous) but it would be simplistic, and maybe even wrong, to say that carbon is objectively better. Let’s take a look at the advantages and disadvantages of each material.

It’s worth saying that these are big generalisations – feel itself is very subjective and different frame shapes and weaves react very differently to different trail conditions. We tested the carbon and aluminium versions of the Devinci Wilson though and found them to have an element of truth.